Rwanda

The ITUC affiliates in Rwanda are the Centrale des Syndicats des Travailleurs du Rwanda (CESTRAR) and the Congrès du Travail et de la Fraternité au Rwanda (COTRAF).
Rwanda ratified Convention No. 87 on Freedom of Association
freedom of association
The right to form and join the trade union of one’s choosing as well as the right of unions to operate freely and carry out their activities without undue interference.
See Guide to the ITUC international trade union rights framework
and Protection of the Right to Organise (1948) in 1988 and Convention No. 98 on the Right to Organise and Collective Bargaining
collective bargaining
The process of negotiating mutually acceptable terms and conditions of employment as well as regulating industrial relations between one or more workers’ representatives, trade unions, or trade union centres on the one hand and an employer, a group of employers or one or more employers’ organisations on the other.
See collective bargaining agreement
(1949) in 1988.
Legal
Freedom of association / Right to organise
Freedom of association
The right to freedom of association is regulated by a Labour Code.
Anti-Union discrimination
The law does not specifically protect workers from anti-union discrimination.
Barriers to the establishment of organisations
- Power to refuse official registration on arbitrary, unjustified or ambiguous grounds
- To obtain registration (a pre-requisite for bargaining status), a union must be able to prove that its representatives have not at any time been sentenced to prison terms of six months or more (Art. 3(5) Ministerial Order No 11 of 07/09/2010).
- Other formalities or requirements which excessively delay or substantially impair the free establishment of organisations
- There is a 90-day timeframe for the authorities to complete an application for registration of a trade union (Art. 5 Ministerial Order No 11 of 07/09/2010).
Restrictions on trade unions’ right to organise their administration
- Other external interference allowed by law
- Unions seeking most representative status must allow the labour administration to check its register of members and property (Art. 124, Law Regulating Labour in Rwanda, 2009).
Categories of workers prohibited or limited from forming or joining a union, or from holding a union office
- Other civil servants and public employees
- Section 51 of Act No. 86/2013 issuing the General Statute of the Public Service recognizes the right of public servants to join any trade union of their choice, with the exception of “political office holders” and “officers of the security services”.
Right to collective bargaining
Right to collective bargaining
The right to collective bargaining is recognised by law.
Barriers to the recognition of collective bargaining agents
- Previous authorisation or approval by authorities required to bargain collectively
- A union must be registered to obtain statutory bargaining status and must publish its articles of association in the Official Gazette to obtain legal capacity (Art. 1, Law Regulating Labour in Rwanda, 2009; Art. 7 Ministerial Order No 11 of 07/09/2010).
- Absence of criteria or discretionary, unclear or unreasonable criteria for determining representative organisations
- The meaning of section 93 of the 2018 Labour Code is unclear. It provides that if in an enterprise there are several employees’ organizations in a company, they team up to conduct collective bargaining. However, if they fail to team up, the organization representing the majority of workers carries on the collective negotiations on behalf of other employees’ organizations.
Restrictions on the principle of free and voluntary bargaining
- Compulsory conciliation
conciliation
An attempt by a neutral third party, a conciliator, to aid the settling of an industrial dispute by improving communications, offering advice and interpreting issues to bring the disputing parties to a point where they can reconcile their differences. The conciliator does not take as active a role as a mediator or an arbitrator.
See arbitration, mediation and / or binding arbitration arbitration A means of resolving disputes outside the courts through the involvement of a neutral third party, which can either be a single arbitrator or an arbitration board. In non-binding arbitration, the disputing parties are free to reject the third party’s recommendation, whilst in binding arbitration they are bound by its decision. Compulsory arbitration denotes the process where arbitration is not voluntarily entered into by the parties, but is prescribed by law or decided by the authorities.
See conciliation, mediation procedure in the event of disputes during collective bargaining collective bargaining The process of negotiating mutually acceptable terms and conditions of employment as well as regulating industrial relations between one or more workers’ representatives, trade unions, or trade union centres on the one hand and an employer, a group of employers or one or more employers’ organisations on the other.
See collective bargaining agreement
, other than in essential services essential services Services the interruption of which would endanger the life, personal safety or health of the whole or part of the population. Can include the hospital sector, electricity and water supply services, and air traffic control. Strikes can be restricted or even prohibited in essential services.
See Guide to the ITUC international trade union rights framework
- The Government may intervene in the settlement of collective labour disputes, within limits established by an Order of the Minister in charge of labour, which, under section 103 of the 2018 Labour Code, determines the organization, functioning of labour inspection and procedure for labour disputes settlements. This Order has not been adopted yet.
Limitations or ban on collective bargaining in certain sectors
- Other civil servants and public employees
- All agents of the security services are exempt from the right to join unions (Art. 51, Law Establishing the General Statutes for Public Service, 2013).
Right to strike
Right to strike
The right to strike is regulated by a Labour Code.
Barriers to lawful strike actions
- Compulsory recourse to arbitration
arbitration
A means of resolving disputes outside the courts through the involvement of a neutral third party, which can either be a single arbitrator or an arbitration board. In non-binding arbitration, the disputing parties are free to reject the third party’s recommendation, whilst in binding arbitration they are bound by its decision. Compulsory arbitration denotes the process where arbitration is not voluntarily entered into by the parties, but is prescribed by law or decided by the authorities.
See conciliation, mediation , or to long and complex conciliation conciliation An attempt by a neutral third party, a conciliator, to aid the settling of an industrial dispute by improving communications, offering advice and interpreting issues to bring the disputing parties to a point where they can reconcile their differences. The conciliator does not take as active a role as a mediator or an arbitrator.
See arbitration, mediation and mediation mediation A process halfway between conciliation and arbitration, in mediation a neutral third party assists the disputing parties in reaching a settlement to an industrial dispute by suggesting possible, non-binding solutions.
See arbitration, conciliation procedures prior to strike strike The most common form of industrial action, a strike is a concerted stoppage of work by employees for a limited period of time. Can assume a wide variety of forms.
See general strike, intermittent strike, rotating strike, sit-down strike, sympathy strike, wildcat strike actions - There is a mandatory conciliation and arbitration process for collective disputes, which can take more than two months (Articles 143-148, Law Regulating Labour in Rwanda, 2013). The right to strike following these procedures is restricted to just two situations: (1) where the arbitration committee fails to reach a decision within 15 days, or (2) where agreements reached under conciliation procedures are not implemented (Art. 151, Law Regulating Labour in Rwanda, 2013).
Limitations or ban on strikes in certain sectors
- Undue restrictions for “public servants”
- Act No. 86/2013 issuing the General Statute of the Public Service does not include provisions recognizing the right to strike for public servants.
- Discretionary determination or excessively long list of “essential services
essential services
Services the interruption of which would endanger the life, personal safety or health of the whole or part of the population. Can include the hospital sector, electricity and water supply services, and air traffic control. Strikes can be restricted or even prohibited in essential services.
See Guide to the ITUC international trade union rights framework
” in which the right to strike strike The most common form of industrial action, a strike is a concerted stoppage of work by employees for a limited period of time. Can assume a wide variety of forms.
See general strike, intermittent strike, rotating strike, sit-down strike, sympathy strike, wildcat strike is prohibited or severely restricted - The Minister of Labour has unfettered discretion to determine both which services are “indispensable” and how the right to strike may be exercised in these services (Art. 155, Law Regulating Labour in Rwanda, 2013).
In practice
PSI affiliate SYPELGAZ (Trade Union for Energy, Water and Sanitation in Rwanda) has been in court since May 2016 to demand proper compensation of its five illegally dismissed Union Executive Committee members and also to demand various other labour-related rights that have long been denied.
The issue dates to 2014, when the government of Rwanda decided to reform the Energy, Water and Sanitation Authority (EWSA) and made it a government-owned company under commercial law. At the time, almost all workers of EWSA were public servants, pursuant to Law No. 87/2013, establishing the General Statutes for Public Service.
The privatisation process led to the split of EWSA into two new companies, Rwanda Energy Group (REG) and the Water and Sanitation Corporation (WASAC), and former public employees were encouraged to compete again for their jobs, since all positions in the two new companies were re-opened. These competitions resulted in the dismissal of 700 workers, mostly trade union members, including five trade union leaders of SYPELGAZ.
SYPELGAZ has been in court since 2016 to demand proper compensation of illegally dismissed workers, including the members of the Union Executive Committee.
So far, around ten cases have been finalised and claimants paid, while over 100 cases are still pending in court, including the case of SYPELGAZ Committee members. Workers’ request the following: (1) compensation for Illegal dismissal; (2) regularisation of salary based on the new salary structure of March 2013; (3) regularisation of bonus; (4) payment of horizontal promotion; and (5) regularisation of final dues. But in all cases so far, the court has dismissed claims regarding compensation for illegal dismissal, the regularisation of bonus and horizontal promotion.
The court listened to an appeal from two lawyers of REG Ltd concerning a decision taken by the Intermediary Court of Nyarugenge, Kigali, on November 27, 2017, re-activating some outstanding rights that were denied to workers of former EWSA.
So far, the full package to be paid to all workers is estimated at nine billion Rwandan francs. SYPELGAZ has requested the intervention of the Ministry of Finance for payment, but REG and WASAC continue to oppose the court decision.
PSI affiliate SYPELGAZ (Trade Union for Energy, Water and Sanitation in Rwanda) has been in court since May 2016 to demand proper compensation for its five illegally dismissed Union Executive Committee members.
The issue dates to 2014, when the government of Rwanda decided to reform the Energy, Water and Sanitation Authority (EWSA) and made it a government-owned company under commercial law. At the time, almost all workers of EWSA were public servants, pursuant to Law No. 87/2013, establishing the General Statutes for Public Service. The privatisation process led to EWSA split into two new companies, Rwanda Energy Group (REG) and the Water and Sanitation Corporation (WASAC), and former public employees were encouraged to compete again for their jobs, since all positions in the two new companies were re-opened. These competitions resulted in the dismissal of 700 workers, mostly trade union members, including five trade union leaders of SYPELGAZ.
SYPELGAZ has been in court since May 2016 to demand proper compensation of its five illegally dismissed Union Executive Committee members and various other longtime denied labour-related rights. After hearing explanations from both sides on 27 November 2017, the Court deferred further pronouncements on the case to 4 June 2018.
In January, the Public Service Commission reviewed the national fiscal report for the years 2015-2016. According to the data, the Government lost 75% of the lawsuits filed against managers in the public sector by its former employees. According to the Commission’s chairperson, such high prevalence of adjudicated violations demonstrates the level of injustice in the public service and points to the lack of serious sanctions for managers who break the law while managing their staff.
Six teachers working for Mweya Private School in Rubavu were illegally dismissed in February 2013 without prior notice contrary to a valid collective agreement. The school claimed to be in financial difficulties but failed to produce an audit report. As a result, the workers filed a complaint with the court which ruled in their favour in June 2014 and ordered the school to pay compensation.